USPTO serial 76295156
XCELOVAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XCELOVAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hertfordshire, GB
Hertfordshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS ET ALONE FOUNTAIN SQ 11911 FREEDOM DR STE400RESTON, VA 20190-5645Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS AND SUBSTANCES FOR THE TREATMENT OF MEDICAL DISEASES, ILLNESSES, AND CONDITIONS RELATED TO THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, MUSCULOSKELETAL CONDITIONS, ANTI-VIRAL CONDITIONS, PAIN CONTROL, SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION CONDITIONS, ANTI-ADDICTIVE CONDITIONS, VACCINES, RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS, AND ALLERGIES | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF A DRY POWDER INHALER | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; EXPLOITATION AND LICENSING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 044 | MEDICAL SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Meridica Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Meridica Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named XCELOVAIR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |