USPTO serial 76295157
XCELONASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XCELONASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hertfordshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS ET AL12010 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 900RESTON, VA 20190-5861UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS AND SUBSTANCES FOR THE TREATMENT OF MEDICAL DISEASES, ILLNESSES, AND CONDITIONS RELATED TO THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM,ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, MUSCULAR SKELETAL CONDITIONS, ANTI-VIRAL CONDITIONS, PAN CONTROL, SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION CONDITIONS, ANTI-ADDICTIVE CONDITIONS, VACCINES, RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS, AND ALLERGIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS, NAMELY, A DEVICE FOR NASAL DELIVERY OF PRE-METERED DOSES OF PHARMACEUTICALS IN DRY POWDER FORMAT | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; EXPLOITATION AND LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | MEDICAL SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |