USPTO serial 76295379
INDY PARTNERSHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INDY PARTNERSHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Indianapolis Regional Economic Development Partnership, Inc.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by Indianapolis Regional Economic Development Partnership, Inc.
Indianapolis Regional Economic Development Partnership, Inc.
Indianapolis, IN
Other trademarks owned by Indianapolis Regional Economic Development Partnership, Inc.
CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP, INC.
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Other trademarks owned by CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP, INC.
CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP, INC.
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Other trademarks owned by CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Saul
James J. Saul Baker & Daniels LLP300 N MERIDIAN ST STE 2700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-1782UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting and relocation services, namely, providing information to businesses on demographics, costs of living, economic incentive programs, economic impact analyses, tax, employment recruiting, labor force breakdowns, unemployment trends, wage rates, commuting patterns and costs of doing business | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 14, 2001 |
| 036 | providing real estate information, real estate site availability information, and financing programs and incentives information to businesses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 14, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Indianapolis Regional Economic Development Partnership, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Indianapolis Regional Economic Development Partnership, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named INDY PARTNERSHIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 1, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |