USPTO serial 76295635
VOICE BUSINESS FINDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOICE BUSINESS FINDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STUART J. SINDER,
STUART J SINDER, KENYON & KENYON,1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing speech-enabled searching capabilities for others in databases and information directories, namely, data automation and processing through proprietary software in the nature of evaluating, sorting, reconfiguring and manipulating data in databases and directories of individuals and businesses to facilitate speech recognition and speech synthesis; technical support for directory assistance providers, namely, data automation and processing through proprietary software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |