Drawing for PROGRESSIVELY GROUNDED DIALOGUE

USPTO serial 76295636

PROGRESSIVELY GROUNDED DIALOGUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PROGRESSIVELY GROUNDED DIALOGUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STUART J. SINDER

STUART J SINDER KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009VOICE USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE FOR SEARCHING OF DATABASES AND DIRECTORIES OF INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESSESACTIVEAug 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2004FAXXFAX SENT—
Sep 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 13, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 13, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 19, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 19, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 28, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance