Drawing for NEW YORK CREDIT

USPTO serial 76295645

NEW YORK CREDIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2668376Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 31, 2002
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with NEW YORK CREDIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Fedrick

Michael Fedrick Loza & Loza, LLP305 N. Second Ave. #127Upland, CA 91786-6064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial consulting services, namely consulting services in the field of accounts receivables management, accounts receivables collections, accounts payable management, cash flow management, business plans, budgets, liquidations, loans, and bankruptcy collections; and financial services, namely accounts receivable management, accounts receivable collections, accounts payable management, cash flow management, business plan preparation, budgeting services, asset liquidation services, court-appointed receivership services, and bankruptcy collectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2022NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2022RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 31, 202289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 26, 2022EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2022PUM1OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1—
Jan 25, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 3, 2022E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2021REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2012NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2012RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 17, 201289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 17, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 28, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 6, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 23, 2008815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 23, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 31, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jul 15, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance