USPTO serial 76295675
TED'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TED'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joanne Ludovici-Lint
JOANNE LUDOVICI-LINT MCDERMOTT WILL EMERY600 13TH ST NW STE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | FRANCHISING SERVICES, NAMELY, OFFERING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF RESTAURANTS, BARS, SPORT BARS AND CATERING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING LIVE MUSICAL AND COMEDIC PERFORMANCE; AND PUBLIC SHOWINGS OF BROADCAST TELEVISION AND SATELLITE SPORTING EVENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ted's Montana Grill, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ted's Montana Grill, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TED'S
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |