Drawing for VOICE SEARCH OPTIMIZER

USPTO serial 76295704

VOICE SEARCH OPTIMIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOICE SEARCH OPTIMIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STUART J. SINDER, ESQ.

STUART J SINDER ESQ KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH SORTING, RECONFIGURING AND MANIPULATING DATA IN DATABASES AND DIRECTORIES OF INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESSES FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH SPEECH RECOGNITION AND SPEECH SYNTHESISACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 15, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 5, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 24, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 3, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 30, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 30, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 27, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance