USPTO serial 76295745
HZBG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HZBG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel D. Fetterley
DANIEL D FETTERLEY ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL, LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electric assembly machines, namely, machines for manufacturing semiconductor wafers; machines for assembling printed circuit boards; injection molding machines for manufacturing optical communication devices, computers, and telecommunications equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Optical communication peripheral parts, namely, ferrules for terminating optical-fiber cables; patch cords for connecting electronic equipment; semiconductor equipment peripheral parts, namely, mountings for semiconductor chips for the sop, namely, solder package, bga, namely, ball grind array, and qfp, namely, quad flat package types; telecommunications equipment and peripheral parts, namely, global positioning systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering and technical consultation services, namely, designing computer software for others and analyzing data processing in field of tooling engineering; and selection and implementation of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HZBG
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |