Drawing for MATCHED VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76296086

MATCHED VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATCHED VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mr Martin Hoffman

MARTIN HOFFMAN HOFFMAN, WASSON & GITLER, PC2361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3856

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Crushing machines and parts for producing sized product in mineral comminutionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance