USPTO serial 76296123
THE RO-GO WHEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE RO-GO WHEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WINDSOR ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S. HALE
JOHN S HALE GIPPLE & HALE 6665-A OLD DOMINION DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | WHEELCHAIR EQUIPPED WITH HUMAN POWERED MECHANICAL DRIVE GEAR WHICH ALLOWS THE USER TO PROPEL THE CHAIR; MECHANICAL DRIVE GEAR MECHANISM FOR ATTACHMENT TO WHEELCHAIRS, EXERCISE EQUIPMENT, REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT AND BICYCLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |