USPTO serial 76296559
PIACERE VISMARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIACERE VISMARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Fredbeck
ANDREW N FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | ham, sausages, delicatessen products, namely, processed meat, turkey, cheese, delicatessen salads, vegetable salads and mixtures made from them; meat, fish, poultry and game, meat extracts, preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, stewed fruits, eggs, milk, milk and dairy products, excluding ice cream, namely, ice milk and frozen yogurt, edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee, namely, grain based coffee substitute, flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal based snack foods, bread, pastry and confectionery, namely chocolate candy, ices, honey, treacle, yeast, baking powder, salt, mustard, vinegar, sauces, spices, ice | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | wines, distilled spirits and liqueurs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VISMARA S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by AGRI-FOOD HOLDING S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named PIACERE VISMARA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |