USPTO serial 76296611
WEE ANGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEE ANGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK FABER GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Chemical Feed Pumps And Dry Material Feeders | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Solenoid-,Diaphragm-, Piston-, and Motor-Driven Dosing And Metering Pumps; Electronic Control Systems For Solenoid-, Diaphragm, Piston-, and Motor-Driven Solenoid-, Diaphragm-,Piston- and Motor-Driven Dosing and Metering Pumps; Measuring Systems For Solenoid-, Motor-Driven Solenoid-, Diaphragm-, Piston- and Motor-Driven Sole noid-Diaphragm-, Piston- and Motor Driven Dosing and Metering Pumps; and Accessories For Solenoid, Motor-Driven, Dosing And Metering Pumps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |