USPTO serial 76296653
AMERICAN BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICAN BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Baila H. Celedonia
MARK LERNER ESQ SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLPSTE 1130230 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INFANT AND CHILD SAFETY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SWITCH PLATE COVERS, OUTLETS PLUGS, ELECTRICAL CORD WIND-UPS, ELECTRICAL CORD SHORTENERS, VCR LOCKS, POWER STRIP SAFETY COVERS, AND CHILD FLIGHT VESTS FOR AIRLINE SAFETY; CHILD SAFETY EQUIPMENT IN THE NATURE OF KNEE PROTECTORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | BABY BOTTLES AND PACIFIERS FOR BABIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | ROOM DECOR, NAMELY, ELECTRIC NIGHTLIGHTS, LAMPS, LAMP SHADES; AND TOILET LOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | SEAT BELT TIGHTENERS, CAR SEAT SHADE, CAR SEAT LEVELERS, CHILD SEAT PROTECTORS FOR CARS, GROCERY CART SAFETY STRAPS, RAIN COVERS FOR STROLLERS AND CAR SEAT STRAP COVERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF CHILD CARE, DECALS, BOOK ENDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | NON-METALLIC CHILD SAFETY DEVICES, NAMELY CABINET LOCKS, DOOR LOCKS, DRAWER LOCKS, PLASTIC SLIDING DOOR STOPS, FURNITURE WALL STRAPS, NAMELY STRAPS TO KEEP FURNITURE FROM SLIDING, TABLE EDGE GUARDS, BUMPER GUARDS FOR FURNITURE, FURNITURE FINGER PINCH GUARDS, AND NON-METAL SLIDING DOOR LOCKS; ROOM DECOR NAMELY WALL ORGANIZERS, PICTURE FRAMES AND BABY VIEW MIRRORS; CRIB SHEET SECURITY CLIPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | STOVE TOP SHIELDS, STOVE KNOB COVERS, OVEN DOOR KNOB COVERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BEDDING GOODS, NAMELY, QUILTS, SHEETS, BLANKETS, PILLOW CASES, MATTRESS PADS, PAD COVERS, LINENS AND BATH LINENS; CURTAINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | CHILD LEASHES; LOCKING SAFETY HARNESSES FOR CHILD RESTRAINT | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | RUGS, WALL PAPER | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | INFANT RATTLES, TOYS; TOY BARS FOR STROLLERS AND CAR SEATS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRIMEDIA Magazine Finance Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MEREDITH CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PRIMEDIA Magazine Finance Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named AMERICAN BABY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |