Drawing for AUTOWATCH

USPTO serial 76296718

AUTOWATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOWATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGELP O BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583-0416UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PERFORMING DIAGNOSTIC AND MONITORING FUNCTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE OPERATION AND FUNCTIONING OF SOFTWARE, CAMERAS, MEMORY LOAD AND CONNECTIVITY OF CUSTOMER SITESACTIVE
042COMPUTER NETWORK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING REPORTS ON THE OPERATION AND FUNCTIONING OF SOFTWARE, CAMERAS, MEMORY LOAD AND CONNECTIVITY ISSUES RELATED TO CUSTOMER NETWORK SITESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 4, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 20, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
May 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 2, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 18, 200244DASEC. 44(D) CLAIM ADDED
Mar 18, 20021.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED
Mar 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance