USPTO serial 76296801
HYDRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYDRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire
Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP60 STATE STREETBOSTON, MA 02109-1816UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceuticals preparations for regenerating human tissues and organs, for blocking or promoting vessel development, and for treatment of human disease where the treatment involves generation of, interference with or effects upon one or more signaling molecules, excluding pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of skin conditions, namely dry skin and eczema; pharmaceutical preparations in the nature of biologicals for regenerating human tissues and organs, for blocking or promoting vessel development, and for treatment of human disease where the treatment involves generation of, interference with or effects upon one or more signaling molecules, excluding pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of skin conditions, namely dry skin and eczema; and pharmaceutical preparations in the nature of genetic therapies for regenerating human tissues and organs, for blocking or promoting vessel development, and for treatment of human disease where the treatment involves generation of, interference with or effects upon one or more signaling molecules, excluding pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of skin conditions, namely dry skin and eczema; oral contraceptives; spermicides; tests and assays composed primarily of mammalian cells, ion channels, signaling molecules, dedifferentiated or dedifferentiating cells, and cellular contractile organizational structures for identifying molecules that can induce desirable cardiovascular, reproductive, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, infectious, hematologic, oncologic, metabolic, neurologic, pulmonary, immunologic, renal, rheumatologic, dermatologic or vision results; and tests and assays composed primarily of mammalian cells, ion channels, signaling molecules, dedifferentiated or dedifferentiating cells, and cellular contractile organizational structures for identifying a risk of cardiovascular, reproductive, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, infectious, hematologic, oncologic, metabolic, neurologic, pulmonary, immunologic, renal, rheumatologic, dermatologic and vision diseases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |