Drawing for 2.0

USPTO serial 76296926

2.0

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 2.0?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Antony J. McShane

ANTONY J. MCSHANE NEAL GERBER & EISENBERG LLP2 NORTH LASALLE STREET SUITE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034smoker's articles, namely, cigarettesACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Apr 25, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 25, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Apr 23, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Apr 23, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Oct 3, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 3, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Oct 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Apr 6, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 6, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Apr 6, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Oct 18, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILEDโ€”
Oct 16, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 16, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Oct 16, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILEDโ€”
Apr 10, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 10, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Apr 10, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2016NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 3, 2016TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKSโ€”
Nov 3, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999โ€”
Jul 1, 2016OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999โ€”
Jul 23, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999โ€”
Jul 23, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999โ€”
Sep 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRSโ€”
Dec 17, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
Nov 11, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
Jul 24, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 17, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Mar 26, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Feb 21, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEYโ€”
Feb 21, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTEDโ€”
Feb 21, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTEDโ€”
Feb 12, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTABโ€”
Jan 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jul 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jun 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Mar 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Mar 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Sep 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Aug 28, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVEDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance