USPTO serial 76297310
KING SA DE MODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 8, 2005
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KING SA DE MODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 3500130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, coats, cuffs, gloves, jackets, shirt fronts, leggings, neckties, overalls, overcoats, underpants, pullovers, scarves, shawls, shirts, ski boots, skirts, suits, sweaters, swimsuits, tee-shirts, topcoats, pants, underwear, vests and waistcoats; knitwear, namely, pajamas, sports jerseys, sweaters, tights, trousers, underwear, vests and waistcoats; footwear and headwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kosher International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kosher International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kosher International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named KING SA DE MODE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | RPUB | NOA CANCELLED; REPUBLICATION REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |