Drawing for ERASE EFFICIENT RISK ANALYSIS SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT

USPTO serial 76297450

ERASE EFFICIENT RISK ANALYSIS SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2706308Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 15, 2003
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ERASE EFFICIENT RISK ANALYSIS SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. John Campaign

H. John Campaign Michael Best & Friedrich LLP100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 3300Milwaukee, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO BE USED IN CONNECTION TO RISK AND FRAUD MANAGEMENT, AS WELL AS ENTERPRISE RISK MONITORING SOLUTIONSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
042Development, updating and design for others of software to be used in connection with risk and fraud management and enterprise risk monitoring solutions; automation services, namely, integration of computer systems and computer networks in the fields of risk and fraud management and risk monitoring solutions; and computer consultation services in the fields of risk and fraud management and risk monitoring solutionsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Feb 22, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 15, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 5, 2008CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Sep 18, 2007CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 16, 2007CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Dec 19, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 9, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 15, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 7, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 20021.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Mar 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance