USPTO serial 76297481
ACCELERATED COMPREHENSION TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCELERATED COMPREHENSION TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
iPerceptions 360 Research Inc.
Westmount, Quebec H3Z 1T3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melise R. Blakeslee
MELISE R BLAKESLEE MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY600 13TH ST NW STE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Conducting on-line research and surveys of interactive media applications; compilation, analysis, assessment and reporting of the views and experience of users of interactive media applications; qualitative and quantitative analysis of interactive media applications; conducting business and market research and surveys; consulting services relating to the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |