Drawing for OSH ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE

USPTO serial 76297637

OSH ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALLORAN, COLLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OSH ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749555 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HARDWARE AND HOME IMPROVEMENTACTIVEDec 26, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance