USPTO serial 76297638
AFD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AFD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8010, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle C. Burke
MICHELLE C BURKE MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE ST STE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for decoding digital television broadcast signals; computer hardware, namely, integrated circuits and integrated circuit boards; televisions; videocassette recorders; videodisk recorders; digital television broadcast signal decoders; set top boxes for controlling access to cable, satellite and terrestrial broadcasting, and digital broadcast signal receivers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |