Drawing for USM EXTENSION

USPTO serial 76297775

USM EXTENSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOKOLS, GWEN P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with USM EXTENSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. Kelly

JOHN E KELLY KELLY BAUERSFELD LOWRY & KELLEY, LLP6320 CANOGA AVE STE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-7704UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS TO HELP OTHERS DEVELOP PERSONAL GROWTH, INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS AND PERSONAL EXPRESSION; AND DISTRIBUTING COURSE MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH SAID SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPSACTIVEJan 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 3, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 29, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 1, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 28, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 9, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance