USPTO serial 76298135
ARMSTRONG RANCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2944276Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2005
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARMSTRONG RANCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calistoga, CA
Calistoga, CA
Calistoga, CA
Calistoga, CA
Calistoga, CA
Calistoga, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melville Owen
MELVILLE OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2448UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | FRESH WINE GRAPES USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF WINE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 22, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Byrne, Thomas J.
- Other trademarks owned by Byrne, Thomas J.
- Other trademarks owned by Byrne, Thomas J.
- Other trademarks owned by Armstrong-Byrne, Jane
- Other trademarks owned by Armstrong-Byrne, Jane
- Other trademarks owned by Armstrong-Byrne, Jane
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named ARMSTRONG RANCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |