Drawing for HEALY HUDSON

USPTO serial 76298416

HEALY HUDSON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALY HUDSON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter D. Vogi

PETER D VOGI PENNIE EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 17NEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE TO ALLOW USERS TO PERFORM ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO ENHANCE THE AUDIO-VISUAL CAPABILITIES OF MULTIMEDIA APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, FOR THE INTEGRATION OF TEXT, AUDIO, GRAPHICS, STILL IMAGES AND MOVING PICTURESACTIVE—
035PROVIDING STATISTICAL INFORMATION; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES; ADMINISTRATION CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE INDUSTRIAL FIELD; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATTERACTIVE—
038PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; TELECOMMUNICATIONS GATEWAY SERVICES; CABLE TELEVISION TRANSMISSION SERVICES; RADIO TRANSMISSION SERVICES, NAMELY, CABLE RADIO TRANSMISSION SERVICES AND SATELLITE RADIO TRANSMISSION SERVICES; CELLULAR WIRELESS TELEPHONE SERVICES; LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES; EMAIL SERVICESACTIVE—
041MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE PRODUCTION SERVICESACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTING SERVICES; COMPUTER CONSULTATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES; COMPUTER SITE DESIGN; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB PAGES FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance