USPTO serial 76298455
DATABASE SCATTERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2626959Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2002
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DATABASE SCATTERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, NJ
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY SOFTWARE FOR ENABLING LARGE SCALE DATABASE IMPLEMENTATIONS TO SCALE OUT AND DISTRIBUTE THE WORKLOAD AND REDUNDANCY REQUIREMENTS TO SUPPORT A HUGE AMOUNT OF VOLUME IT IS ACCOMPLISHED BY A LAYER OF SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS MIDDLEWARE THAT ENABLES MULTIPLE DATABASE SERVERS JOIN TO FORM A SCATTER SET THAT ACTS AS ONE DATABASE TO DIVIDE LOAD, ENTIRELY TRANSPARENT TO THE CLIENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |