USPTO serial 76298566
MARKETAGILITY ENTERPRISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MARKETAGILITY ENTERPRISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ariana G. Voigt
ARIANA G VOIGT MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE STSTE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software programs for extensible mark-up language (XML)-based technologies and supply-side solutions used to facilitate business-to-business e-commerce transactions, and training manuals sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications and booklets featuring information about extensible mark-up language (XML)-based technologies and supply-sided solutions used to facilitate business-to-business electronic commerce transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems with systems for executing business sales transactions via the global communications network, via telephone, e-mail, and on-site, in person assistance; computer consultation, namely, developing computer software for others with extensible mark-up language (XML)-based technologies and supply-side solutions for executing business sales transactions via the global communications network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |