Drawing for INFINITY

USPTO serial 76298573

INFINITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFINITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and DorrLLP60 STATE STREETBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Diagnostic assays and test kits comprised of reagents for scientific, research and medical research use to diagnose, prognose, predict or treat diseases and for providing genomic and proteomic profiles useful in the selection of therapeutics; assays and test kits comprised primarily of reagents for scientific, research and medical research use to evaluate efficacy of treatments and treatment progress; genetic identity prognostic test kits comprised primarily of reagents for identifying hereditary risk factors; prognostic test kits comprised of reagents for identifying hereditary risk factors for medical research use; diagnostic preparations, namely, preparations of extracts, assays, nucleic acids, proteins, polypeptides, and antibodies, and molecular arrays of biological materials for scientific, research and medical research useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 16, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 16, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 13, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance