Drawing for PADINAL

USPTO serial 76298607

PADINAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PADINAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Holly M. Ford

HOLLY M FORD BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD1001 G ST NW FL 11WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4597UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003dentrifice, gingival gel for farm animalsACTIVE—
005pharmaceutical products, namely, preparations for the treatment of osteoarthritis; veterinary products, namely, preparation for the treatment of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis; nutritional supplements for farm animals; and food supplements to strengthen bone mass and to treat discomfort due to osteoarthritisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 3, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 16, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance