USPTO serial 76298782
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $850
SAN DIEGO, CA, US
San Diego, CA, US
SAN DIEGO, CA, US
SAN DIEGO, CA, US
SAN DIEGO, CA, US
San Diego, CA, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Tietsworth,
Steven C. Tietsworth, SEESCAN, INC.3855 RUFFIN ROADGENERAL COUNSEL, SEESCAN, INC.SAN DIEGO, CA 92123| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Line locators, namely, portable electronic instruments that function as electromagnetic [ and acoustic] devices for locating buried pipes and cables [; line illuminators and transmitters, namely, portable electronic instruments that function as electromagnetic and acoustic devices that impress signals on underground pipes and cables to enable the same to be located; leak detection equipment, namely, portable electronic instruments that detect and identify fluid and gas leaks in buried pipes; ground penetrating radar, namely, radar that detects underground pipes and cables; acoustic imaging equipment, namely, portable electronic instruments that form images of underground structures utilizing sound emissions; and underground imaging equipment, namely, portable electronic instruments that utilize electromagnetic energy for generating images of underground structures ] | ACTIVE | Jan 11, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 22, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 21, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |