USPTO serial 76298832
OP I.LINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OP I.LINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | optical cables; electrical cables; electrical connectors; terminals; adapter boards; electrical converter boxes; video cameras; electronic still cameras; video recorders and/or players; video projectors; set top boxes used for receiving and transmitting signals of satellite TV programs and cable TV programs; televisions; computers; computer displays; audio/video tape players and/or recorders; audio/video disc players and/or recorders; IC memory players and/or recorders; radios; telephones; portable phones; personal digital assistants; speakers; tuners; amplifiers; headphones; microphones; earphones; video game players; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |