Drawing for ROYAL DEMEURE HOTEL GROUP

USPTO serial 76298930

ROYAL DEMEURE HOTEL GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYAL DEMEURE HOTEL GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Seana F.C. LaPlace

SEANA F C LAPLACE LACKENBACH SIEGEL1 CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4160UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PUBLISHED MATERIALS AND PRINTS, NAMELY, STATIONERY, BOOKLETS, INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS, BROCHURES AND NEWSLETTERS ALL IN THE FIELD OF FOOD, LODGING AND HOTEL SERVICESACTIVE—
041EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR HOTEL AND RESTAURANT SERVICES, ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF HOLDING BANQUETS, RECEPTIONS AND SPORTING EVENTSACTIVE—
042HOTEL, RESORT AND LODGING SERVICES; RESTAURANT SERVICES; RECREATIONAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING SWIMMING POOLS, TENNIS COURTS, GOLFING FACILITIES AND FITNESS FACILITIES; PROVIDING PHYSICAL FITNESS CONSULTATION; HEALTH SPA AND BEAUTY SALON SERVICES; CONFERENCE AND MEETING ROOM SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 31, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 9, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 3, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance