Drawing for GALAZAR NETWORKS

USPTO serial 76298947

GALAZAR NETWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2911947Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 21, 2004
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GALAZAR NETWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEITH A. WELTSCH

KEITH A. WELTSCH SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY, & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZSUITE 300GARDEN CITY, NY 11530-3322

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications products, namely chipsets for switching and port processing of data transmission and networking signals for use by telecommunications equipment providers and telecommunications and data communications infrastructure providersEXPIRED—
037[Installation of computer hardware]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
042[Computer network planning, namely, network design for others; computer application and system integration; computer software installation]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 18, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 17, 2014NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2014NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED—
Sep 17, 20148.PRREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED—
Jan 10, 20118.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 10, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 2010ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 4, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 20041.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jun 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance