USPTO serial 76298952
TIGER BEAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIGER BEAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Edelman and Michael S. Adler
SCOTT A EDELMAN & MICHAEL S ADLER GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 4000LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3026UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS AND PERFUMERY; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR GLITTER, SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR SPRAY AND SPRITZ; AND SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATH SPLASH, MOISTURIZER, POWDER, SPARKLE POWDER, BATH GEL, BATH FIZZ BALLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | SUNGLASSES, EYEGLASS FRAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | LAMPS AND LAMP SHADES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | STATIONERY GOODS, NAMELY, PAPER JOURNALS; NOTEBOOKS; FOLDERS; BAGS; TOTES; BACKPACKS; FOLDERS; BOOK COVERS; WRITING PAPER; ENVELOPES; PENCIL CASES; ERASERS; DATE BOOKS AND CALCULATORS; PENCIL CASES; POSTERS AND WRITING INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, PENS AND PENCILS; STENCILS; COMPARTMENTALIZED ORGANIZERS FOR STORING SCHOOL SUPPLIES, AND MEMORANDUM BOARD WITH MIRROR, FOR INSTALLATION IN A STORAGE LOCKER | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | PILLOWS, PICTURE FRAMES, MIRRORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BEDDING GOODS, NAMELY, BED BLANKETS, BED LINENS, SHEETS, COMFORTERS, BEDSPREADS, PILLOW COVERS, DUVET COVERS, THROWS, DECORATIVE PILLOWS, BEDSKIRTS, SHEETS AND SHEET SETS, DUST RUFFLES, DRAPES AND CURTAINS, WINDOW BLINDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, CLIPS, BANDS, BOWS, PINS, RIBBONS, BUCKLES, AND ORNAMENTS NOT OF PRECIOUS METALS, AND CLOTH PATCHES FOR CLOTHING, HAIR BARRETTES, HAIR TIES, HEADBANDS, SCRUNCHIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | WALL PAPER; WALL BOARDERS; ROOM DECOR, NAMELY, RUGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LAUFER MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PRIMEDIA Magazine Finance Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PRIMEDIA Magazine Finance Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named TIGER BEAT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |