Drawing for I-THERAPY

USPTO serial 76298987

I-THERAPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-THERAPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stanley H. Cohen

STANLEY H COHEN CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN & ET ALSEVEN PENN CTR 12TH FL1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT ASSISTS ANESTHESIOLOGY IN THE RECORDING AND REPORTING OF ANESTHESIA RELATED DATAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 31, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 31, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 14, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance