USPTO serial 76299109
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Downers Grove, IL
Other trademarks owned by Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Downers Grove, IL
Other trademarks owned by Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc.
Downers Grove, IL
Other trademarks owned by Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT J. MAJOR
SCOTT J. MAJOR MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN P.C.2200 CLARENDON BLVD. SUITE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing clearinghouse services and clearinghouse information via a web site on the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | OPERATING A CLEARINGHOUSE FOR THE PROCESSING AND EXCHANGE OF CREDITS AND FUNDS BETWEEN RETAIL BUSINESSES, DOMESTICALLY AND INTERNATIONALLY, AND PROVIDING INTERNET ACCESS TO THE CLEARINGHOUSE INFORMATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 25, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |