USPTO serial 76299126
AUTOMATIC DOORS SHOULD NOT BE NOTICED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOMATIC DOORS SHOULD NOT BE NOTICED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
261 22 Landskrona, SE
LANDSKRONA, SE
LANDSKRONA, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
LAUREL V DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Swinging doors, sliding doors, folding doors and revolving doors of metal; fixed mounted wind catchers and wind shielding walls for diversion of wind at entrances, of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electronical controlled electro-mechanic, electro-hydraulic and electropneumatic door openers; electronic sensors for opening, closing and stopping of doors for entry and exit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Besam AB
- Other trademarks owned by BESAM INTERNATIONAL HB
- Other trademarks owned by BESAM INTERNATIONAL HB
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AUTOMATIC DOORS SHOULD NOT BE NOTICED
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |