USPTO serial 76299151
INKSLINGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3069617Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2006
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INKSLINGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey P. Thennisch
Inkslingers, Inc.P.O. BOX 583Roseville, MI 48066UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Necklaces, pins being jewelry, and body jewelry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 21, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |