USPTO serial 76299164
IMALUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3064017Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2006
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IMALUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Optical Coherence Technologies, Inc.
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Optical Coherence Technologies, Inc.
Optical Coherence Technologies, Inc.
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Optical Coherence Technologies, Inc.
Optical Coherence Technologies, Inc.
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Optical Coherence Technologies, Inc.
Cleveland, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JASON A. WORGULL
JASON A. WORGULL RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 EUCLID AVENUE19TH FLOORCLEVELAND, OH 44115-1414Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | optical coherence tomography imaging services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 16, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Optical Coherence Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Optical Coherence Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Optical Coherence Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Imalux Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IMALUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |