Drawing for JANI-SOURCE

USPTO serial 76299168

JANI-SOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JANI-SOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. LAUBSCHER, JR

LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER JR LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER JR1160 SPA RD STE 2BANNAPOLIS, MD 21403-1099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003General cleaning and maintenance products, namely heavy duty, multi-purpose degreasers, all-purpose cleaners, floor wax, floor stripping/cleaning preparations, cleaner for use on toilets, cleaner for use on drains, cleaner for use on glass, furniture, and appliances, cleaner for use on wood floors, automobile cleaners, hand soap, carpet cleaners, paint remover, laundry detergent, stain remover, fabric softener, dish detergent, stainless steel polishABANDONEDNov 6, 1998
035Retail stores featuring janitorial and food service itemsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 12, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 12, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 12, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 5, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 11, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 7, 2003CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Dec 10, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance