USPTO serial 76299199
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY B. GOLDSMITH
AMY B GOLDSMITH GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY TWO-WAY RADIO DISPATCHING SERVICES, ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, TEXT, VIDEO, IMAGES, DATA AND MESSAGES BY MEANS OF WIRELESS DEVICES, PAGING SERVICES, CELLULAR AND DIGITAL MOBILE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES AND DIGITAL CELLULAR DEVICES; ELECTRONIC MAIL; TELEPHONE VOICE MESSAGING SERVICES; TEXT, NUMERIC AND IMAGE WIRELESS MESSAGING; ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC AND DIGITAL WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES; WEB MESSAGING; WORLDWIDE SWITCHED TEXT AND MESSAGE TRANSMISSION SERVICES; AUDIO AND VIDEO TELECONFERENCING SERVICES; PROVIDING CONNECTIONS TO WORLDWIDE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, NAMELY, PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK BY MEANS OF A CELLULAR AND DIGITAL TELEPHONE SYSTEM AND PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ON-LINE SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING ACCESS TO CELLULAR, DIGITAL AND WIRELESS TELEPHONE OR PERSONAL DIGITAL DEVICE CUSTOMERS TO THE INTERNET, WORLDWIDE WIRELESS WEB, INTRANETS, NETWORKS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS VIA THEIR CELLULAR, DIGITAL AND WIRELESS TELEPHONE OR PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO ONLINE ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS ON A VARIETY OF TOPICS OF PUBLIC INTEREST FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS WHO ARE CELLULAR, DIGITAL AND WIRELESS TELEPHONE OR PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT CUSTOMERS ENABLING THEM TO TRANSMIT MESSAGES TO CELLULAR, DIGITAL AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES OR PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS OVER THE INTERNET OR WORLDWIDE WIRELESS WEB; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, CELLULAR AND DIGITAL WIRELESS ROAMING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |