USPTO serial 76299343
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
3422 Bad Lauterberg, DE
3422 Bad Lauterberg, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
PETER J RIEBLING KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSEMAN1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NWSTE 700 E LOBBYWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Testing machine for batteries, namely battery testers; alkaline accumulators, lead accumulators, starter batteries, electric motor vehicle batteries, dry batteries, stationary batteries and accessories for all of the aforesaid accumulators and batteries, namely cell stoppers, water refill stoppers, and water refill devices used for refilling batteries with water, namely, battery bulb filler; acidity measurers, namely acid hydrometers; battery cables, namely connection cables; battery connection plugs; battery charging devices, namely charging panels and charging cables, battery testing devices, namely hydrometers, load testers, and voltmeters; direct current and alternating current converters for emergency power generators and battery charging devices and electrical relays to be used therewith; computers and utility programs therefor; data processing machines; power supplies; electrical switching equipment for safety lighting installations, namely switches; voltage regulators for generators in motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Leasing of motor vehicle equipment, namely, alkaline accumulators, lead accumulators, starter batteries, electric motor vehicle batteries, dry batteries, stationary batteries, alternative power generating systems, battery charging equipment and battery test equipment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2002 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |