Drawing for DETA

USPTO serial 76299343

DETA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DETA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Riebling

PETER J RIEBLING KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSEMAN1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NWSTE 700 E LOBBYWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Testing machine for batteries, namely battery testers; alkaline accumulators, lead accumulators, starter batteries, electric motor vehicle batteries, dry batteries, stationary batteries and accessories for all of the aforesaid accumulators and batteries, namely cell stoppers, water refill stoppers, and water refill devices used for refilling batteries with water, namely, battery bulb filler; acidity measurers, namely acid hydrometers; battery cables, namely connection cables; battery connection plugs; battery charging devices, namely charging panels and charging cables, battery testing devices, namely hydrometers, load testers, and voltmeters; direct current and alternating current converters for emergency power generators and battery charging devices and electrical relays to be used therewith; computers and utility programs therefor; data processing machines; power supplies; electrical switching equipment for safety lighting installations, namely switches; voltage regulators for generators in motor vehiclesACTIVE—
039Leasing of motor vehicle equipment, namely, alkaline accumulators, lead accumulators, starter batteries, electric motor vehicle batteries, dry batteries, stationary batteries, alternative power generating systems, battery charging equipment and battery test equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 23, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2002NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
May 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance