USPTO serial 76299366
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christel Emerson
CHRISTEL EMERSON HENKEL CORPORATION2200 RENAISSANCE BLVD THE TRIAD, STEGULPH MILLS, PA 19406UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Electric and battery-operated shears, razor, shavers, clippers and trimmers; hand tools, namely, nail sets; pedicure and manicure implements, namely, nail files, nail clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, nail and cuticle scissors | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electric hair curling irons, electric curling brushes, electric hot air hair brushes, electric hair setters, electric misting curling iron, heated facial iron and misting facial iron, motorized hair braider, electric hair straightener, electric hair crimper, electrical heated hair rollers and hair setters | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Hand-held electric hair dryers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Hair brushes, hair combs, non-electric hair brushes and combs, nail brushes | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair clips, barrettes, hair bands, ponytail holders, hair pins, hair ornaments in the nature of hair wraps, non-electric hair rollers, and hair accessories, namely twisters, claw clips, snap clips, hair bows, hair ribbons and hair scrunchies | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |