USPTO serial 76299395
MDS SCIEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2958934Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2005
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MDS SCIEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concord, Ontario, CA
Concord, Ontario, CA
Concord, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janice M. Bereskin
Peter E. Brent, Senior Vice President MDS INC.71 Four Valley DriveCONCORD ONTARIO, CANADA L4KCANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Trace chemical analyzers featuring an ionizer to ionize the trace chemical under study, and a mass spectrometer to analyze the ionized trace chemical, and scientific computer programs for instrument control and information processing | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consulting services relating to chemical methodology - namely, providing advice and information relative to methods and techniques for detecting chemicals which are present in very small concentrations | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 27, 2010 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2010 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |