USPTO serial 76299788
HAIR-SKIN-BODY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAIR-SKIN-BODY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod S. Berman
ROD S BERMAN JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and makeup kits comprised of lipstick, lip gloss, mascara, lip and eye liners, lip stick and gloss, eye shadow, blush, foundation, concealer, and make up brushes, facial cleanser, facial moisturizer, hair shampoo and hair conditioner, eye lash curler, tweezers and nail files; beauty masks for face and body; shampoo and conditioners, namely hair and skin conditioners; facial concealers, face and body cleansers, face and body creams, face and body emulsions, facial makeup; body powder; lotions for skin, face and body, and hair-waving lotions; hair mousse, face and body soaps, facial toners, bath beads, bath crystals, bath foam, bath gels, bath lotion, bath oil, bath pearls, bath powder, bubble bath, non-medicated bath salts, body oil; body sprays, liquid soaps for hands, face and body; non-medicated body soaks, scented body spray, and wax strips for removing body hair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |