USPTO serial 76299873
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
6-chome Shinagawa-ku Tokyo 141, JP
6-chome Shinagawa-ku Tokyo 141, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO CAMERAS; VIDEO CAMERAS COMBINED WITH VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS/PLAYERS; VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS/PLAYERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR EDITING VIDEO IMAGES; EDITING, ENCODING AND DECODING SYSTEM OF DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS COMPRISED OF PERSONAL COMPUTERS, CIRCUIT BOARDS, AND APPLICATIONS SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE DISPLAY OF VIDEO DATA ON DISPLAY MONITORS OF PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND VIDEO GAME DISPLAYS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT INTERPRETS, PROCESSES AND/OR PROJECTS VIDEO DATA, NAMELY, COMPOSITE VIDEO IMAGES ONTO THE DISPLAY MONITORS OF PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND VIDEO GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PRODUCTION OF DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | STREAMING AND DELIVERY OF VIDEO IMAGES VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | DUPLICATION OF DIGITAL DISCS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES AND VIDEO EDITING; RENTAL OF TAPE RECORDERS/PLAYERS, NAMELY, VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS AND PLAYERS; PRODUCTION OF DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS AND RENTAL OF VIDEO CAMERAS COMBINED WITH VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS/PLAYERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | RENTAL OF PERSONAL COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR EDITING VIDEO IMAGES, FOR EDITING, ENCODING AND DECODING DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS, FOR VIEWING VIDEO IMAGES ON DISPLAY MONITORS OF PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND/OR VIDEO | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |