Drawing for THE LEADER IN INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY

USPTO serial 76299972

THE LEADER IN INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2739234Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 15, 2003
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE LEADER IN INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Lockhart, Esq.

Steven J. Lockhart, Esq. Finfrock2400 Apopka BlvdApopka, FL 32703

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Construction of precast concrete structures, construction, management and general contractor services for residential, commercial, and mixed-use facilitiesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 20, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2024CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 15, 2022REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2012NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2012RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 1, 201289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 1, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 20088.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Sep 29, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 25, 2008ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2003R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 9, 2003CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 10, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance