Drawing for SOLO LOW SODIUM SEA SALT

USPTO serial 76299998

SOLO LOW SODIUM SEA SALT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLO LOW SODIUM SEA SALT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan E. Hollander

SUSAN E HOLLANDER MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP1001 PAGE MILL RD BLDG 2PALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Cereal-based snack foods, namely, salted snack foodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 14, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 8, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 6, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 16, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance