USPTO serial 76300188
MIAMI SPICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIAMI SPICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Convent Station, NJ
Convent Station, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrances, namely, perfume | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |