USPTO serial 76300189
ROCK RESPONSIBLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3042129Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2006
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROCK RESPONSIBLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN T. POLIKALAS
Polikalas, Steven T STEVEN T. POLIKALAS, LTD.6119 Ridgeview Court Suite 100RENO, NV 89519UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Condoms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 9, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |